1
Dan & Ephraim’s special relaonship
& its connecon with the Brish Isles
by Mikkel S. Kragh
A lecture delivered at the annual conference of the Brish Israel Bible Truth Fellowship,
London, 9 May, 2026
Among the 12 Tribes of Israel, the two tribes of Dan and Ephraim have a special relaonship.
We can see this special relaonship right from the birth of the 12 patriarchs, throughout the
Old Testament, in the New Testament, in post-Biblical historical events and even in future
prophec events.
The tribe of Dan had a unique role among the 12 Tribes as a pioneering tribe. It was a tribe
that would start what the other tribes would follow. This fact was pointed out in the most
famous book wrien about the tribe of Dan, Dan: The Pioneer of Israel (1880), wrien by
Colonel John Cox Gawler, who was the keeper of the Brish Crown Jewels at the Tower of
London.
But Dan would not only be a pioneer of the Tribes of Israel in general. Dan would in
parcular be a pioneer of the tribe of Ephraim, so much so that this arcle just as well could
have been entled “Dan: The Pioneer of Ephraim”. Another was of saying this is
“What starts in Dan is mulplied in Ephraim”
In this arcle, we are going to show that this is a principle that has occurred many mes in
the Old Testament, as well as in the history of the Lost Tribes in their exile in Europe, and is
also going to take place in future prophec events. This principle is so consistent that it
cannot simply be similar, but coincidental, historical events. Rather, it is a principle that the
God of Israel has put into the “spiritual DNA”, so to speak, of the tribes of Dan and Ephraim.
Example #1: The patriarchs Dan, Joseph and Ephraim
2
The rst me we encounter the principle of “What starts in Dan is mulplied in Ephraim” is
with the 12 patriarchs, who were the children of Jacob-Israel and his four wives, Leah,
Rachel, Bilhah and Zilpah. In the Biblical era, a man’s eldest son received the birthright,
which meant a double inheritance compared to the younger brothers. But contrary to
custom, Jacob’s birthright was desned not to be handed down to his eldest son Reuben,
but to the son of his favourite wife, Rachel (1 Chron 5:1-2).
Before we start, ask yourself this queson: Who was the rst son of Rachel? Many would
probably answer: Joseph. But that is not enrely true. Aer Leah had born four sons to
Jacob-Israel, barren Rachel became envious at her sister Leah, and told Jacob to take her
handmaid Bilhah as wife (or concubine) so Rachel could get a child through Bilhah:
“And when Rachel saw that she bare Jacob no children, Rachel envied her sister; and said
unto Jacob, Give me children, or else I die. And Jacob’s anger was kindled against Rachel:
and he said, Am I in God’s stead, who hath withheld from thee the fruit of the womb? And
she said, Behold my maid Bilhah, go in unto her; and she shall bear upon my knees, that I
may also have children by her. And she gave him Bilhah her handmaid to wife: and Jacob
went in unto her. And Bilhah conceived, and bare Jacob a son. And Rachel said, God hath
judged me, and hath also heard my voice, and hath given me a son: therefore called she
his name Dan.” (Gen 30:1-6)
Rachel’s rst son was therefore not Joseph, but Dan, because she said: “God... hath given
me a son... Dan”. Dan was, of course, only Rachel’s adopted son, because Dan’s birth mother
was Bilhah, but Dan was nonetheless Rachel’s rst son.
Aer Jacob’s three other wives had given birth to another ve sons, Rachel nally gave birth
to a son of her own, Joseph. Since Rachel was Jacob’s favourite wife, Joseph also became
Jacob’s favourite son.
Dan was therefore a foreshadow of Jacob’s favourite son, because Dan was Rachel’s rst
son. But Dan was only Rachel’s adopted son, and Jacob’s favourite son was only born when
Rachel gave birth to a son of her own esh. Dan was a type, or foreshadow, of Joseph.
Ephraim: Joseph’s principal heir
Joseph eclipsed his brothers by becoming viceroy of Egypt, and got two sons, Manasseh and
Ephraim. When Jacob blessed Joseph’s two sons, he gave the greater blessing to Ephraim
(Gen 48:19-20). Ephraim thereby became Joseph’s principal heir.
Example #2: The judges Samson & Samuel
3
The second me we nd the principle “What starts in Dan is mulplied in Ephraim” is with
the two last great judges of Israel, Samson and Samuel. Samson was of the tribe of Dan and
Samuel of the tribe of Ephraim.
(The judge Eli is, indeed, menoned between Samson and Samuel, but Eli is only menoned
in connecon with the raising up of Samuel, not because of what he did himself. Eli’s job as
judge ended in failure. We can therefore state that the two last great judges were Samson
and Samuel, and ignore Eli.)
What was the principal task of Samson and Samuel, besides making the Israelites worship
the God of Israel and not pagan gods? It was to deliver Israel from the Philisnes.
When the angel of God told the Danites Manoah and his wife that they were going to have a
son, he said of Samson: “For, lo, thou shalt conceive, and bear a son; and no razor shall
come on his head: for the child shall be a Nazarite from the womb: and he shall begin to
deliver Israel out of the hand of the Philisnes.” (Judg 13:5) Note that the angel did not say
that Samson WOULD deliver Israel out of the hand of the Philisnes, but that Samson would
BEGIN to deliver Israel out of the hand of the Philisnes. Samson did exactly that as a
miraculous one-man army against the Philisnes, although he eventually got killed himself.
The task of delivering Israel out of the hand of the Philisnes was, however, fullled by
David, who was anointed by Samuel of the tribe of Ephraim.
The task of delivering Israel out of the hand of the Philisnes was started by Samson the
Danite, and was completed by Samuel the Ephraimite when he anointed David as King of
Israel.
Example #3: The idolatry of Dan & Ephraim
The love child of Samson & Delilah
Samson is generally considered to be a type or foreshadow of the Lord Jesus Christ. Some of
their similaries were:
1) Both of their births were announced by an angel
2) Both had supernatural divine power
3) Both lived under the occupaon of a Genle naon (the Philisnes and Rome)
4) Both loved the people of the Genle occupaon, and were rebuked by their Israelite
compatriots for doing so
5) Both voluntarily let themselves be arrested by armed men of the tribe of Judah, who
handed them over to the Genle occupaonal army, who eventually let them be
killed
6) The greatest miracle in both their lives was when they died (Samson by tearing down
the temple of Dagon, and Christ in the resurrecon)
4
7) Both were betrayed by a person who received silver coins (Delilah and Judas Iscariot)
This last similarity is connected with the next example of the principle “What is starts in Dan
is mulplied in Ephraim”.
The Philisnes could not defeat Samson, and therefore they oered Delilah 1,100 pieces of
silver to nd out why Samson was so strong and how he could be defeated (Judg 16:5-6).
This is, obviously, a parallel to Christ, who was betrayed by Judas Iscariot for 30 pieces of
silver (Ma 26:14-16).
Aer Samson’s death, the Bible narrave in the Book of Judges does not explicitly menon
what happened to Delilah, but God has given us some clues. Immediately aer Samson’s
death and burial in Judges chapter 16, we read in chapter 17 about Micah, who lived in
Mount Ephraim and who had a mother who had 1,100 pieces of silver, which Micah had
stolen from her:
“And there was a man of mount Ephraim, whose name was Micah. And he said unto his
mother, The eleven hundred shekels of silver that were taken from thee, about which thou
cursedst, and spakest of also in mine ears, behold, the silver is with me; I took it. And his
mother said, Blessed be thou of the LORD, my son.” (Judg 17:1-2)
The Bible is the Word of God. Why did God then let the divinely inspired author of the Book
of Judges menon rst in chapter 16 that Delilah received 1,100 pieces of silver, and then in
the following chapter menon that an unnamed woman had 1,100 pieces of silver? Because
the two women are one and the same: Delilah.
Samson was romancally involved with several Philisne women, including one prostute,
so it is safe to assume that Samson and Delilah were lovers. What oen happens when a
man and a woman are lovers? The woman gets pregnant and gives birth to a child. Micah
menoned in Judges chapter 17 is therefore none other than the love child of Samson and
Delilah.
It is not hard to imagine why Delilah would ee from the land of the Philisnes when she
found out she was pregnant with Samson’s child. Samson had, aer all, been the greatest
adversary of the Philisnes and killed thousands of Philisnes. When Samson was nally
dead and Delilah found out she was carrying Samson’s unborn child, do you think the
Philisnes would say: “Congratulaons, Delilah.” Of course not. They would fear that
Samson’s unborn child had the same powers as his father, and would therefore kill Delilah
and her unborn son if they found out about Delilah’s pregnancy.
Delilah must have taken her 1,100 silver coins and moved to Mount Ephraim, which was in
the Israelite heartland far from the land of the Philisnes, where she gave birth to Micah.
Why did Micah steal his mother’s 1,100 silver coins? Because he knew it was her reward for
betraying his father and geng him killed. It was blood money. Micah must have been full of
resentment toward his mother.
5
Aer Micah had given back the 1,100 silver coins he had stolen from his mother, Delilah gave
Micah 200 of the silver coins, and he used them to make two idols (Judg 17:3-4). This would
come as no surprise, because Delilah was a Philisne, and the Philisnes were idolaters.
Later, Micah employed Jonathan (Judg 18:30), a Levite from Bethlehem in Judah, to be priest
for his house.
Dan’s idol
Aer Samson’s death, the tribe of Dan migrated to an area in the north of the land of Israel,
around what today is the archaeological site of Tel Dan just south of the border between the
State of Israel and the Republic of Lebanon:
“In those days there was no king in Israel: and in those days the tribe of the Danites
sought them an inheritance to dwell in; for unto that day all their inheritance had not
fallen unto them among the tribes of Israel.” (Judg 18:1)
The Danites rst sent out 5 spies to search out the new territory, and then sent 600 warriors
to take over the new territory (Judg 18:11). On their way, they passed through Mount
Ephraim and stopped at Micah’s house and stole Micah’s idols and convinced Micah’s Levite
priest to become priest for the enre tribe of Dan in their new territory (Judg 18:17-20).
When the Danites seled in their new northern territory, they set up the idols they had
stolen from Micah to be their gods, and made the Levite Jonathan their priest:
“And the children of Dan set up the graven image: and Jonathan, the son of Gershom, the
son of Manasseh, he and his sons were priests to the tribe of Dan unl the day of the
capvity of the land. And they set up Micah’s graven image, which he made, all the me
the house of God was in Shiloh.” (Judg 18:30-31)
Inially, the idol that Dan set up in their new northern territory was only a sin of the tribe of
Dan. But it would not remain that way, as we shall see.
Switched chronology of Judges chapters 17-18 and 19-21
Before we proceed, it must be menoned that there is reason to believe that the chronology
in the last third of the Book of Judges has been switched.
The last half of the Book of Judges consists of three stories:
1) The story of Samson (chapters 13-16)
2) The migraon of the tribe of Dan to the north (chapters 17-18)
3) The Civil War in Israel between the tribe of Benjamin and the other 11 tribes
(chapters 19-21)
6
The reason why we can say that the chronology has been switched, is because the central
character in the Civil War (chapters 19-21) is a Levite from Bethlehem in Judah. But in the
preceding story about the migraon of the tribe of Dan (chapters 17-18), the migrang
Danites meet Jonathan the Levite, who was also from Bethlehem in Judah, and the Danites
already knew his voice. How could the Danites know his voice, unless he was already a
famous man in Israel?
Chronologically, the story about the Civil War (chapters 19-21) must precede the story about
the migraon of the tribe of Dan (chapters 17-18). The author of the Book of Judges must
have inserted the story about the migraon of the tribe of Dan immediately aer the story
of Samson in order to connect the story of Samson (chapters 13-16) with the story of Delilah
and Micah and the rest of the tribe of Dan (chapters 17-18).
Jeroboam’s golden calves at Dan and Bethel
We have now seen that Samson was a type of the Lord Jesus, that Delilah was a type of
Judas Iscariot, and that 200 of the 1,100 silver coins she had received to betray Samson were
used to make idols that eventually became the idols of the enre tribe of Dan.
We are now coming to the third example of “What starts in Dan is mulplied in Ephraim”.
When the tribe of Dan set up an idolatrous religion in their newly founded northern territory
in the middle of the 11th century BC, it was at rst only a sin for their own tribe. But it did
not remain so.
King Solomon began his reign as an illustrious and god-fearing king, but ended up as an
idolator and was the cause of the ruin of the United Kingdom of Israel. Aer Solomon’s son,
King Rehoboam, had ascended the throne of Israel in 931 BC, Jeroboam of the tribe of
Ephraim led a successful revolt against Rehoboam, and Jeroboam became king of the 10
Tribes of Israel, also known as the Kingdom of Israel, the House of Israel and the House of
Ephraim (because Ephraim was the leading tribe).
When Jeroboam became king, he decided to start a new naonal religion, or state church if
you will, for the Kingdom of Israel of the 10 Tribes. Jeroboam reasoned that if the 10 Tribes
connued to go up to Jerusalem to worship at the Temple in Jerusalem, they would
eventually want to be reunited with the two tribes of the House of Judah. Consequently, he
raised up two new religious sites that would be the sites of the new state church of the
Kingdom of Israel of the 10 Tribes. The two sites each had an idolatrous golden calf, and the
two sites were situated in Dan and Bethel. Dan was, of course, in the new northern territory
of the tribe of Dan. Bethel was in the territory of the tribe of Ephraim:
“And Jeroboam said in his heart, Now shall the kingdom return to the house of David: If
this people go up to do sacrice in the house of the LORD at Jerusalem, then shall the
heart of this people turn again unto their lord, even unto Rehoboam king of Judah, and
they shall kill me, and go again to Rehoboam king of Judah. Whereupon the king took
7
counsel, and made two calves of gold, and said unto them, It is too much for you to go up
to Jerusalem: behold thy gods, O Israel, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt.
And he set the one in Beth-el, and the other put he in Dan.” (1 Kings 12:26-28)
Aer King Jeroboam had instuted this new idolatry as the state church of the Kingdom of
Israel, the 10 Tribes of Israel shamelessly connued to worship pagan gods unl the God of
Israel nally had had enough of them and “divorced” the 10 Tribes (as we read about in the
Book of Hosea chapter 1), and let the 10 Tribes be deported out of the land of Israel by the
hand of the Assyrian Empire around 721 BC.
Bible students who study the Lost Tribes of Israel know very well that this was an epic event
in God’s plan with mankind, because the 10 Tribes migrated to Europe, where they became
the naons of north-western Europe, as well as their daughter naons across the world,
including the United States of America.
Thus, we see that the exile of the 10 Tribes of Israel that eventually ended up in Europe and
the Brish Isles, was caused by the idolatry of the tribe of Ephraim, which was preceded by
the idolatry of the tribe of Dan, which was preceded by Delilah’s betrayal of Samson, who
was a type of Christ.
(We also see a parallel to the New Testament, where the Lord Jesus Christ was betrayed by
Judas Iscariot, and rejected by the House of Judah (the Jews). Judah was therefore cut o
from God’s Covenant and sent into exile outside the land of Israel.)
Example #4: The regathering of Ephraim in the Brish Isles
We have now seen three clear-cut examples from the Old Testament that “What starts in
Dan is mulplied in Ephraim”. If God is the Divine Author of the Bible and this tribal principle
is of God and not just a coincidence, should we also expect to nd it in the post-Biblical
secular history of the tribes of Dan and Ephraim? We certainly should.
Brish-Israelites believe that the Brish people – the English, the Scots, the Welsh and the
people of Northern Ireland - are of the tribe of Ephraim. Along with the other 10 Tribes of
Israel, the tribe of Ephraim was deported out of the land of Israel around 721 BC by the
Assyrian Empire, and soon aer, they disappeared from world history.
The rst queson is then: When did the descendants of the exiled Ephraimites arrive in the
Brish Isles?
The second queson is: When did the tribe of Ephraim reestablish itself in the Brish Isles to
become a tribal naon, or rather a “multude of naons” as Jacob-Israel prophesied about
Ephraim in Genesis 48:19, under the names England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, the
United Kingdom, and later their daughter naons across the oceans: Canada, Australia, New
Zealand and South Africa?
8
In Brish-Israel literature the ethnic groups that usually are idened as descendants of the
exiled Israelites that arrived in the Brish Isles are the following:
1) The Celts. The Celts started to migrate into the Brish Isles between 600 and 500 BC,
approximately 120-220 years aer the deportaon of the 10 Tribes of Israel.
2) The Angles, Saxons and Jutes. The Angles, Saxons and Jutes were Germanic-speaking
tribes that lived in northern Germany and Denmark. They seled en masse in
England between the 5th and 8th centuries AD.
3) The Vikings. Danish and Norwegian Vikings raided and seled in Britain starng with
the raid on Lindisfarne Island in AD 793. The Vikings only seled in smaller numbers.
Danish Vikings seled primarily in Yorkshire and the north-east of England, while
Norwegian Vikings seled in the coastal areas of Scotland, Ireland, north-western
England and in parcular on the Orkney Islands and Shetland Islands.
4) The Normans. The Norman conquest in 1066 brought a lot of Norse-French Normans
into England, in parcular the south-east of England.
We can therefore safely say that the Israelite tribe of Ephraim had reestablished itself as a
tribal naon in the Brish Isles by the me of the Norman Conquest in 1066.
The Tribe of Dan arrives in Ireland
The astute student of the Lost Tribes of Israel may have noced that we have omied one
parcular immigraon of Israelites into the Brish Isles. That is because the subject of this
arcle is “What starts in Dan is mulplied in Ephraim”. We have already shown this principle
by several examples in Bible history. If the peoples of the United Kingdom, indeed, are the
regathered Israelite tribe of Ephraim, then we should also expect that the regathering of the
tribe of Ephraim into the Brish Isles was preceded by an immigraon of the tribe of Dan
into the Brish Isles.
And that is EXACTLY what Brish-Israelites have claimed for almost 200 years.
Ancient Irish history speak of two tribes that migrated to Ireland via the sea and conquered
the island. Both The Annals of Ireland by the Four Masters (1636), a work based on much
older material, and Georey Keange’s History of Ireland (1634) say that a people called the
Tuatha dé Danaan – meaning the tribe of Danaan – conquered Ireland around 1200 BC.
Approximately 200 years later, around the year 1000 BC, another people, the Milesians,
arrived in Ireland and took possession of that island. The Tuatha dé Danaan and the
Milesians must have been of the same ethnic origin, because they were able to
communicate with each other in their nave tongues. The Tuatha dé Danaan were
descendants of Israelite Danites that had le Egypt prior to the Exodus led by the Danite
prince Danaos and seled in Greece where they were known as Danai. Later the Danai tribe
sailed to the Iberian Peninsula, from where they sailed to Ireland.
9
We have just shown from Bible history that “What starts in Dan is mulplied in Ephraim”.
Now we have also seen that aer Dan arrived in the Brish Isles around 1200 BC, the tribe of
Ephraim started to regather in the Brish Isles and eventually reestablished Ephraim as a
tribal naon by the year AD 1066. Thus, the principle “What starts in Dan is mulplied in
Ephraim” did not only take place in past Biblical history, it also took place in post-Biblical
history when you see it through tradional Brish-Israelite lenses.
This last example is shown from a tradional Brish-Israel perspecve. It is not based on
discoveries I claim to have made myself.
But the next and nal example IS something I have discovered, or at least something I
believe I have discovered, myself.
Example #5: Dan and Ephraim in the Book of Revelaon
One of the great mysteries of the Book of Revelaon is why Dan and Ephraim are missing
from the 144,000 sealed Israelites. In Revelaon chapter 7, we read that 144,000 male virgin
Israelites of the 12 Tribes of Israel are going to be sealed and protected before the Great
Tribulaon commences.
There are various theories as to why Dan and Ephraim are missing. Aer much prayer and
many studies, this is the conclusion I came to:
The reason why Dan and Ephraim are missing from among the 144,000 is because of the
Two Witnesses menoned in Revelaon chapter 11. These Two Witnesses will be able to
shut the heaven so it does not rain, like Elijah did, and to make the waters into blood, like
Moses did, and to smite the earth with all kinds of plagues, as oen as they will, again much
like Moses and Elijah.
Moses and Elijah were, of course, real people. The Two Witnesses must therefore also be
real people. The prophet Malachi, in the last book of the Old Testament, prophesied that
prior to the great and dreadful day of the Lord: “Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet
before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD.” (Mal 4:5) Prior to Christ’s
rst coming, this was fullled in John the Bapst, who came in the spirit and power of Elijah,
as Christ said: “For all the prophets and the law prophesied unl John. And if ye will receive
it, this is Elias, which was for to come.” (Ma 11:13-14) (Elias is the Greek version of the
Hebrew name Elijah.)
Like John the Bapst came in the spirit and power of Elijah prior to the First Coming of
Christ, the Two Witnesses will also come in the spirit and power of Elijah prior to the Second
Coming of Christ.
This brings us to the connecon between the Two Witnesses and the 144,000 sealed
Israelites. The Two Witnesses are going to be of the tribe of Dan and the tribe of Ephraim,
respecvely. That is the reason why Dan and Ephraim are missing from the 144,000.
10
Solving the puzzle of the 144,000
This is how we solve the puzzle about the 144,000:
To make a long story short: Of the 144,000 sealed Israelites, there are 12,000 from most of
the tribes. The excepons are Dan, Ephraim and Manasseh.
It is obvious that Dan is enrely missing from the 144,000. But not only is Dan missing.
Ephraim is also not menoned by name. Instead, 12,000 Israelites of a so-called “tribe of
Joseph” is menoned, even though there never was a “tribe of Joseph”, because Joseph’s
two sons, Manasseh and Ephraim, each became ancestors of their own tribe.
Since there never was a tribe of Joseph, the 12,000 Israelites of the so-called tribe of Joseph
are 6,000 of the tribe of Manasseh and 6,000 of the tribe of Ephraim. Manasseh is already
listed among the tribes with 12,000 sealed Israelites. The total number of sealed Israelites of
Manasseh is, therefore, 12,000 + 6,000 = 18,000 sealed Israelites of Manasseh.
Therefore, there are 18,000 sealed of Manasseh, 6,000 sealed of Ephraim, and none sealed
of Dan.
Why are there 18,000 sealed Israelites of Manasseh, while most of the other tribes only
have 12,000? That is because the birthright was given to Joseph, and the tribes of Manasseh
and Ephraim were blessed more than the other tribes: “For Judah prevailed above his
brethren, and of him came the chief ruler, but the birthright was Joseph’s” (1 Chron 5:2)
But since 18,000 of Manasseh are going to be sealed, why are there only going to be sealed
6,000 of Ephraim? Aer all, when Jacob-Israel blessed Manasseh and Ephraim he gave the
greater blessing to Ephraim: “he [Manasseh] also shall become a people, and he also shall
be great: but truly his younger brother [Ephraim] shall be greater than he, and his seed
shall become a multude of naons.” (Gen 48:19)
In other words, since there are 18,000 sealed of Manasseh and 6,000 sealed of Ephraim,
Ephraim is underrepresented with 12,000 sealed. Also, since the 6,000 of Ephraim are
menoned under the name of Joseph, the name of Ephraim is also missing.
Therefore, among the 144,000, both Dan and Ephraim are missing with 12,000 each, and
both the names of Dan and Ephraim are also missing.
If each of the Two Witnesses of Dan and Ephraim are equal to 12,000 sealed Israelites, this
would solve the puzzle perfectly. If the Two Witnesses are of Dan and Ephraim, all the Tribes
of Israel are represented among the 144,000 and the Two Witnesses.
So, how do we know if this theory is true or false? Time will tell. If there do arise two great
prophets of Danite and Ephraimite ancestry prior to the Second Coming of Christ, then this
theory is correct. If not, then it is incorrect. Time will tell.
11
Summary
We have now shown ve examples of the principle “What starts in Dan is mulplied in
Ephraim”, both from the Bible, history and future prophecy. They are:
1) The patriarchs Dan & Joseph (& Ephraim)
2) The judges Samson & Samuel
3) The idolatry of Dan & Jeroboam
4) The Tuatha dé Danaan & the Milesians in Ireland & the Celts, Angles, Saxons, Jutes,
Vikings & Normans in Great Britain
5) The Two Witnesses of Dan & Ephraim in Revelaon chapter 11
The 12 Tribes of Israel in the End Times
Whether this theory is correct or not, the fact that Dan and Ephraim are missing from the
144,000 does show that the special relaonship between Dan and Ephraim is going to
connue unl the End Times.
The fact that God is going to seal 144,000 Israelites as rsruits before the Great Tribulaon
also goes to show that the 12 Tribes of Israel do have a special place in God’s plan, just like
they had in the Old Testament Era.
In the last book of the Bible, God specically seals and protects 144,000 Israelites. Not only
does He seal 144,000 Israelites, but each tribe is also menoned in a very specic order and
with a dierent number of sealed men.
Since the 12 Tribes of Israel are of vital importance to God from Genesis to Revelaon, it
should quite obviously also be of the greatest importance for Chrisans to nd out who and
where the 12 Tribes of Israel are today, and, if possible, where the parcular tribes are
located. If it is important to God, it should also be important for those that follow Him.
AMEN.
May 2026
